• ,V7--Schai, Pascal A, Thornhill ot al. : Total knee-arthropiasty \vilh !he PI-'C system results at a minimum of Ion years and survivorship analysis. JB.1S, 80B. 1WS; 850-858.
  38-lnsall JN, Clarke 111) : Historic development, classification, and characteristics of knee prostheses. In: Surgry of the knee. By Insall JN and Scott WN Churchill livingstone, 2004; 1516-1552.
  39-Bouhm, Paul, Holy, Tatjna: Is there a future for hinged prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty a 20- year survivorship analysis of the Blauth prosthesis. JRJS, SOB, 1998; 302-309.
  40-Petrou G, Petou H, Tikerklis C ct al. : Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hing total knee replacement. JBJS, 86B. 2004; 813-817.
  41 -HeiinkFl^rTl^enr~S~
  developed ceramics offer new solutions. Biomaterials, 23 ,
  1539-1551.
  42-Huang CH, Ming H, Liau JJ et al. : Osteolysis in failed total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees. JBJS, 84A, 2002; 2224-2229.
  43-Lachiewicz PF, Soileau E : The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. JBJS, 86A, 2004; 525-530.
  44-Callaghafi JJ: Mobile-bearing knee replacement: Cinical results. A' review of the literature. Clin Orthop, 392, 2001; 221-226.
  45-Wilson CJ, Fitzgerald B, Tait GR : Five year review of the rotaglide total knee arthroplasty.The Knee, 10, 2003; 167-171.